Jump to content

ENSO State and Georgia Winters

Sign in to follow this  


The main focus on this article is not to make a winter forecast, but  to explore what effects El Nino's and teleconnections have on winter weather across the southeast. One of the main sources of data in this report comes from a weather friend of mine that I call "Brother Larry". Larry would prefer to remain anonymous, so from here on out you'll hear me refer to Larry as "Brother Larry". 🙂  Larry has a wealth of information about the weather history in Georgia, and I'll be using a lot of his findings to help give you an idea how this winter may turn out, based on the environment created by the El Nino, as well as several other factors. Again, this data is based on analog years, or those years that most closely identify with the current patterns, so keep that in mind. Analog's are not perfect, but they do give us a very good idea about how things have happened in the past and how they may happen again in the future. 

Again, almost all of the text below (other than a few of my own edits and additions) is from Larry, and he gets all the credit for the research and stats.


This data was compiled by taking a list of 26 “cold” US winters (Dec/Jan/Feb) since 1894 -1895 (i.e., the coldest 23%) for the eastern third of the US. This requires solid, widespread, below normal anomalies, and requires the southeast to be pretty chilly itself. The two maps to the right were created with data from the list of years below, but that dataset only goes back to 1948, so the maps I'm displaying are not 100% complete with the years in the list. Here's the list of those winters, and you can see the years I used on the maps themselves. 
Also, Larry's 26 coldest winters study was done the better part of 10 years back, since then, it is possible that some of 09, 10, 13, 14, etc. could be added, although he is not reassessing those now.
  • 2002 - 2003
  • 1995 - 1996
  • 1993 - 1994
  • 1981 - 1982
  • 1980 - 1981
  • 1978 - 1979
  • 1977 - 1978
  • 1976 - 1977
  • 1969 - 1970
  • 1968 - 1969
  • 1967 - 1968
  • 1963 - 1964
  • 1962 - 1963
  • 1960 - 1961
  • 1947 - 1948
  • 1939 - 1940
  • 1935 - 1936
  • 1917 - 1918
  • 1911 - 1912
  • 1909 - 1910
  • 1904 - 1905
  • 1903 - 1904
  • 1901 - 1902
  • 1900 - 1901
  • 1898 - 1899
  • 1894 - 1895
Temperature Anomalies


Nino Base State

ENSO Regions
ONI Chart from Golden Gate Weather Services - oni.png
So now that we have our list of base years, let's look at the base Nino state for those winters. Before we can do that, we need to take a look at the various Nino/Nina classifications. Graphs and Charts

The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) has become the standard that NOAA uses for identifying El Niño (warm) and La Niña (cool) events in the tropical Pacific.  The ONI is defined as the running 3-month mean SST anomaly for the Niño 3.4 region (i.e., 50N-50S, 120W-170W).  Events are defined as 5 consecutive overlapping 3-month periods at or above the +0.5 anomaly for warm (El Niño) events and at or below the -0.5 anomaly for cold (La Niña) events.  The threshold is further broken down into: 
  • Weak (with a 0.5 to 0.9 SST anomaly)
  • Moderate (1.0 to 1.4)
  • Strong (1.5 to 1.9)
  • Very Strong (≥ 2.0) 
For the purpose of this blog post, for an event to be categorized as weak, moderate, strong or very strong, it must have equaled or exceeded the threshold for at least 3 consecutive overlapping 3-month periods. Here's an analysis of the 26 cold winters by ENSO state: 
  • Strong Nino: 0 of 26 (0%)
  • Moderate Nino: 1 of 26 (4%)
  • Weak Nino: 9 of 26 (35%)
  • Neutral positive: 4 of 26 (15%)
  • Neutral negative: 5 of 26 (19%)
  • Weak Nina: 6 of 26 (23%)
  • Moderate Nina: 1 of 26 (4%)
  • Strong Nina: 0 of 26 (0%)
Dec-Feb temperature anomalies during weak Nino's
Notice that out of all the cold years, the majority of them occurred during weak Nino's (35%). Also notice that out of all of those cold winters, none of them occurred with a strong Nino or a strong Nina

The map on the left depicts the temperature anomalies that occurred during a Weak Nino. Due to the data only going back to 1948, all of the years are not depicted, but this will give you a good idea. 

As you can see, a weak Nino is what we'd like to see come Dec-Feb. If the current one stays too strong, it could severely limit our cold this winter based on past analogs. keep in mind, Larry's study is based on temperatures, not precipitation.  


Nino and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)

+PDO or Warm State
-PDO or Cold State

PicturePDO Index (http://www.daculaweather.com/4_pdo_index.php)

While it's easy to look at one specific weather pattern, there are many factors that determine how a winter will turn out, with the ENSO state being just one of those. But there are other teleconnections and long term patterns that also have an effect on our winter weather, and they all work in tandem with each other.  Graphs and Charts

Now we are going to turn our attention to the PDO state or Pacific Decadal Oscillation. First, the definition from the National Center for Environmental Information:

"The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) is often described as a long-lived El Niño-like pattern of Pacific climate variability (Zhang et al. 1997). As seen with the better-known El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), extremes in the PDO pattern are marked by widespread variations in the Pacific Basin and the North American climate. In parallel with the ENSO phenomenon, the extreme phases of the PDO have been classified as being either warm or cool, as defined by ocean temperature anomalies in the northeast and tropical Pacific Ocean. When SSTs are anomalously cool in the interior North Pacific and warm along the Pacific Coast, and when sea level pressures are below average over the North Pacific, the PDO has a positive value. When the climate anomaly patterns are reversed, with warm SST anomalies in the interior and cool SST anomalies along the North American coast, or above average sea level pressures over the North Pacific, the PDO has a negative value (Courtesy of Mantua, 1999). " 

Here's an analysis of the cold 26 winters by DJF averaged PDO status:
  • + PDO: 18 of 58 (31%)
  • - PDO: 8 of 57 (14%)
Again, much as it was with weak Nino's, many of our coldest winters occurred during a + PDO state, while only 8 out of 57 occurred during a negative PDO state. 



Nino and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)

In order for us to get long lasting cold air that stays locked in, we need some blocking. There are several teleconnection patterns that aid in developing this blocking, one of which is the North Atlantic Oscillation or NAO. Graphs and Charts
Negative NAO (-NAO)
Positive NAO (+NAO)
Here's the definition of the NAO:
"The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is a climatic phenomenon in the North Atlantic Ocean of fluctuations in the difference of atmospheric pressure at sea level between the Icelandic low and the Azores high. Through fluctuations in the strength of the Icelandic low and the Azores high, it controls the strength and direction of westerly winds and storm tracks across the North Atlantic. It is part of the Arctic Oscillation, and varies over time with no particular periodicity."
Strong positive phases of the NAO tend to be associated with above-average temperatures in the eastern United States and across northern Europe and below-average temperatures in Greenland and oftentimes across southern Europe and the Middle East. They are also associated with above-average precipitation over northern Europe and Scandinavia in winter, and below-average precipitation over southern and central Europe. Opposite patterns of temperature and precipitation anomalies are typically observed during strong negative phases of the NAO. For us, negative is what we're looking for in the winter. 

Let's take a look at the analysis of the cold 26 Dec-Feb winters by averaged NAO status:
  • – NAO: 19 of 48 (40%)
  • + NAO: 7 of 67 (10%)
Again, a large number of the cold winters had a negative NAO. 


Piecing It All Together...


Now let's take the combination of the ENSO state (in our case, Nino), and factor in the PDO and NAO and let's see what we get. Here's the analysis of the 26 cold winters by a combination of Dec-Feb averaged PDO and NAO status:
  • + PDO/-NAO: 12 of 25 (46%)
  • - PDO/-NAO: 7 of 23 (30%) (all 7 had (PDO – NAO) > 0)
  • + PDO/+NAO: 6 of 33 (18%)
  • - PDO/+NAO: 1 of 34 (3%)
Things start to change a little. Obviously, the combination of +PDO and -NAO are the best combination, and that makes perfect sense. During the positive phase of the PDO, the wintertime Aleutian low is deepened and shifted southward, warm/humid air is advected along the North American west coast and temperatures are higher than usual from the Pacific Northwest to Alaska but below normal in Mexico and the southeastern United States. Add the effects of the blocking provided by the NAO and you lock in the cold air instead of having it rush out to sea. 

Now, let's really lay it out.
Here's "Brother Larry's" analysis of the 26 cold winters by a combination of ENSO state and Dec-Feb averaged PDO and NAO status:

Strong Nino:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 0 of 6 (0%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 0 of 1 (0%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 0 of 7 (0%)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 1 (0%)

Moderate Nino:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 1 of 2 (50%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 0 of 0 (N/A)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 0 of 0 (N/A)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 2 (0%)

Weak Nino:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 6 of 7 (86%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 2 of 2 (100%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 1 of 2 (50%)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 4 (0%)

Neutral Positive:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 2 of 4 (50%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 0 of 3 (0%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 2 of 10 (20%)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 5 (0%)

Neutral Negative:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 1 of 3 (33%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 2 of 7 (29%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 2 of 10 (20%)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 5 (0%)

Weak Nina:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 2 of 2 (100%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 3 of 5 (60%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 1 of 4 (25%)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 7 (0%)

Moderate Nina:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 0 of 1 (0%)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 0 of 3 (0%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 0 of 0 (N/A)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 1 of 4 (25%)

Strong Nina:
  • +PDO/-NAO: 0 of 0 (N/A)
  • -PDO/-NAO: 0 of 2 (0%)
  • +PDO/+NAO: 0 of 0 (N/A)
  • -PDO/+NAO: 0 of 6 (0%)



  • Weak Nino’s give the highest percentage chance for cold of any of the ENSO states by far (with weak Nina’s second); however, a combo of -PDO/+NAO seems to make it difficult even for weak Nino’s.
  • A very impressive 13 of 16 (81%) of the aggregate of weak Nino's and weak Nina's with -NAO were cold.
  • Don't ever bet on cold with either a strong Nino or a strong Nina since none of the 23 were cold.
  • +PDO about doubles the percent chance for cold versus a -PDO.
  • A -NAO more than doubles the percentage chance for cold versus a +NAO and a somewhat higher chance than a +PDO gives. So, I give small edge to –NAO over a +PDO regarding cold prospects. Regardless, both are very important.
  • A +PDO/-NAO combo gives close to twice the percentage chance for cold versus the percentage chance for all PDO/NAO combos in the aggregate.
  • A -PDO/-NAO is the next best combo for cold prospects, but mainly if NAO is more negative than PDO.
  • Don't ever bet on cold with a combination of -PDO/+NAO, since only 1 out of 34 were cold.
  • If there is a +PDO, the chances for a –NAO appear to be high for only weak to moderate Nino’s. The chances appear to only be about 50-50 for strong Nino’s. For neutral ENSO, the chances seem to be surprisingly low (partial negative correlation suggested).
  • The best shot at a +PDO/-NAO combo appears to be with a weak to moderate Nino's. On the other hand, only 3 of 34 (9%) Nina’s had a +PDO/-NAO.
  • A pretty high 17 of 34 (50%) Nina’s had a –PDO/+NAO.
  • A +PDO is difficult with a moderate to strong Nina. Only one out of 16 (6%) had one.
  • A –PDO seems rather difficult with a strong Nino, only 2 out of 15 (13%) had one.
  • +PDO and –PDO winters are about evenly split. But +NAO winters have been a bit more common than -NAO in long term: 58% vs. 42%.


Winter Precipitation

Regarding wintry precipitation for Atlanta, when looking at the three standalone super Nino's (1972-1973, 1982 -1983, 1997-1998) as well as the six strong to super strong 2nd year Nino's (1877-1888, 1888-1889, 1896-1887, 1905-1906, 1940-1941, 1987-1988), Atlanta more often than not, had one major winter storm, but not always:
  • 1877-1888: 2.5" 1/3/1878 & a non-major freezing rain followed on 1/9/1878
  • 1888-1889: 6" 2/21/1889
  • 1896-1967: 6.2" 12/2/1896
  • 1905-1906: 6.2" for the season including 3.5"+ major 1/26/1906, measurable snow D, J, and F
  • 1940 -1941: only T of snow
  • 1972 -1973: historic ZR 1/7-8/1973, which included 1" mainly ice pellets; (also, historic snow hit central GA in Feb though Atlanta missed that one)
  • 1982 -1983: 10.3" S/IP for season including 7.9" 3/24/1983 (heaviest since 1940) and measurable snow J, F, and M
  • 1987- 1988: 4.2" of mainly IP 1/7/1988 (would have been ~8" if all snow)
  • 1997- 1998: only 0.6" 12/29/1997



View the full article


Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • MD 0434 CONCERNING SEVERE POTENTIAL...WATCH UNLIKELY FOR WESTERN KENTUCKY...FAR SOUTHEASTERN MISSOURI...SOUTHERN ILLINOIS...AND FAR SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA Mesoscale Discussion 0434 NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 0251 PM CDT Wed Apr 24 2019 Areas affected...western Kentucky...far southeastern Missouri...southern Illinois...and far southwestern Indiana Concerning...Severe potential...Watch unlikely Valid 241951Z - 242045Z Probability of Watch Issuance...5 percent SUMMARY...Ongoing convection may produce isolated instances of wind damage. A WW issuance is not anticipated due to the isolated nature of the threat. DISCUSSION...Surface heating, weakly confluent warm-sector low-level flow, and convergence along synoptic surface boundaries has fostered gradual deepening of convection across southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois. These storms are in a moderately unstable environment, with around 1500 J/kg MUCAPE. Shear is relatively weak, however, with 30-35 kt mid-level flow atop marginal low-level flow resulting in only 30 knots of effective deep shear. This suggest that storms should remain loosely organized, with the isolated severe threat maximized near linear, outflow-dominant bands that can evolve. The isolated nature of the threat precludes any WW issuance at this time, though storms should propagate downstream along the Lower Ohio Valley through sunset. ..Cook.. 04/24/2019 ...Please see www.spc.noaa.gov for graphic product... ATTN...WFO...LMK...PAH...MEG...LSX... LAT...LON 38128912 38348826 38458722 38408682 38248653 38078645 37848663 37778683 37508735 37058806 36718891 36518975 36439038 36619055 36759060 36929058 37259035 37539004 37688986 38128912 Read more View the full article
    • MD 0433 CONCERNING SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WATCH 98... FOR CENTRAL...SOUTHERN...AND SOUTHEASTERN TEXAS Mesoscale Discussion 0433 NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 0231 PM CDT Wed Apr 24 2019 Areas affected...central...southern...and southeastern Texas Concerning...Severe Thunderstorm Watch 98... Valid 241931Z - 242100Z The severe weather threat for Severe Thunderstorm Watch 98 continues. SUMMARY...The severe threat continues across WW 98. Areas south of WW 98 may experience convective development later, with hail and gusty winds possible. DISCUSSION...The severe threat continues across WW 98. Most of the ongoing convection continues along and north of an outflow boundary located from roughly 50 W COT to near/northwest of NIR to just south of CLL. This boundary separates surface-based convection from more elevated convection atop a relatively stable low-level airmass. Nevertheless, a linear, mostly sub-severe complex has begun to forward-propagate across northern and central portions of WW 98, and should impact the Austin/San Antonio Metro areas around 21Z or so. These storms will need to reach a more buoyant airmass located east of the aforementioned outflow to have a more extensive severe threat - though surface obs indicate that outflow has started to retreat northward near Fayette and Gonzales Counties. It is not out of the question for the southern flank of the ongoing elevated MCS to begin ingesting more surface-based parcels over the next 2-3 hours. Farther south, mid-level capping has held strong and limited deep convective development. High-resolution models/CAMS indicate that at least isolated convective development will develop (most likely along a southeastward-moving composite outflow/cold front that moved through DRT over the past hour). Should these storms materialize, the threat for hail and damaging wind gusts may necessitate a WW issuance. ..Cook/Thompson.. 04/24/2019 ...Please see www.spc.noaa.gov for graphic product... ATTN...WFO...HGX...FWD...CRP...EWX...SJT... LAT...LON 31269871 31439819 31309691 31019632 30509607 29789609 28989658 28559698 27999799 27579908 27769965 28709984 29369978 30139949 30629921 31269871 Read more View the full article
    • Here's a look at the 3 months with the most tornadoes. You can see that our numbers start to go down for May. https://www.ustornadoes.com/2016/04/06/annual-and-monthly-tornado-averages-across-the-united-states/
    • MD 0432 CONCERNING SEVERE POTENTIAL...WATCH POSSIBLE FOR CENTRAL INTO SOUTHEASTERN TEXAS Mesoscale Discussion 0432 NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 1011 AM CDT Wed Apr 24 2019 Areas affected...central into southeastern Texas Concerning...Severe potential...Watch possible Valid 241511Z - 241715Z Probability of Watch Issuance...40 percent SUMMARY...A WW issuance may be needed in portions of the discussion area - most likely from 16Z onward. DISCUSSION...Mostly sub-severe convection continues currently amidst a complicated surface pattern, with a remnant outflow extending from near CLL to 40 S SAT to near DRT. Surface-based convection persists near the outflow, with one dominant cell over western Gonzales county exhibiting signs of mid-level rotation. Though low-level wind fields remain weak, any favorable interaction between updrafts associated with this convection along the remnant outflow may result in a brief tornado. Over time, strengthening low-level wind fields associated with low-level cyclogenesis and approach of a mid-level wave centered over northern Mexico will probably result in 1) stalling and/or slow northward retreat of the outflow and 2) gradually increased organization of convection. Any storms near/south of this outflow will be surface-based owing to near 70F dewpoints, while steepening mid-level lapse rates will increase buoyancy and result in an increased threat for all modes of severe. North of the boundary, a gradually organizing linear complex near SJT and other scattered convection near HDO/SAT/AUS may pose a threat for marginally severe hail and perhaps an isolated damaging wind gust. Convective trends continue to be monitored, and a WW issuance may be needed at some point after 16Z or so. ..Cook/Thompson.. 04/24/2019 ...Please see www.spc.noaa.gov for graphic product... ATTN...WFO...HGX...FWD...CRP...EWX...SJT...MAF... LAT...LON 31460105 31520008 31419820 31049668 30489576 29839546 28879575 28309648 27949798 27949940 28350026 29170094 29720142 30350162 31040137 31190130 31460105 Read more View the full article
    • Flood Warning issued April 24 at 10:52AM EDT until April 25 at 12:40PM EDT by NWS View the full article
  • Create New...